I have an XJ, a YJ and a Disco 2 and I love all of them. In fact, I wanted a Land Rover before I even got into Jeeps, in particular the Defender then as time went on the Discovery, but at the time I was younger and really didn't have the income to afford one. I've wheeled the XJ and the YJ for many years stock and in very interesting situations, I've also wheeled the XJ and YJ in moderately modified configuration in more challenging places and finally the YJ in very difficult situations once I had it quite modified, though not insanely so like some of the tubed trailer queens you see out there. I've taken the Disco off road a few times to feel out her limitations and spent a week doing some overlanding and light wheeling in it and I was quite a bit more comfortable on that long trip that in either of my Jeeps.
Before I answer the OP's question, I should point out that with anything, it is 90% operator, 10% equipment and in a lot of cases that ratio is more like 95/5. Chrysler caused a huge problem with the off road industry with their heavy pushing of the Jeep brand and all "trail rated" nonsense with their whole lineup for that matter, most especially with the Jeep Wrangler "Rubicon" model. Their efforts have caused a massive boom in the 4WD industry over the last 10 or so years that has been a real double edged sword. On the one hand, it is great to have more exposure, awareness and generally more support for off roading from a larger base of people, on the other hand there are that many more people off roading and in most cases putting more pressure on the ecosystem than it can handle. The Rubicon trail is a great case in point, over the last 10 years I've watched that trail get, pardon the expression, run into the ground. When I was out there last year it was an absolute zoo; there were so many people out there it was completely insane, Buck Island lake was a circus. The trail has seen so much traffic areas in recent years that ares that used to be fun have pratically been paved and the old entrance that was relatively challenging has been blown apart to make it easier for the inexperienced people to get in. There has been so much abuse over the years that they have actually had to close parts of it down and those closures are not likely to stop; it is really sad, that used to be a great trail.
Another part of the problem is that it seems like every time I turn around there's another "fabrication" shop opening up, as though every redneck with a welder thinks he can reengineer a truck's suspension for the better and while it is true in some cases, there are more bad "shops" out there than good lately. There are a lot of people getting off road with very well equipped vehicles these days, in many cases direct from the factory, but no skill to back it up. I've handed the keys of my sprung over YJ on 35"s over more than once to someone that watched me do a rock obstacle in a few minutes and then proceeded to watch them spend 45 minutes and not even get more than a few feet into it- 90% operator, 10% equipment. And while speed isn't the focus with that observation, skill is; though the speed issue brings up speed and skill based rock crawling competitions and their insanely destructive influence altogether but that's a topic I'm going to avoid for right now.
So what does all my complaining about how the off road industry has screwed off roading in recent years have to do with the OP? Well, it explains a few observations. There are a lot of Jeeps off road, a lot, but there are not neccessarily a lot of competent drivers off road. There are a lot of very modified Jeeps and again, not neccessarily driven by experienced off roaders. There are a lot of fabrication "experts" that think they can completely reengineer a trucks suspension and more often than not, you see those trucks/jeeps/whatever with broken parts because they quite frequently do not engineer things correctly and end up beefing up one area only to add more stress and worse angles to another potentially stock or underimproved area. I think some of these fab guys should have paid more attention in Calc.
If you take a competant driver and stick them in a decent truck of any sort, they can do things you wouldn't think possible. So...
quote:
If you were dropped off in the middle of nowhere and had a choice of a Jeep or a Land Rover, which would you pick?
Leaving brand out of it first, then adding it back in I would quite simply choose the most reliable vehicle with the simplest design that was easy to work on if something failed. Given those requirements, the Jeep YJ for me wins hands down in the boonies challenge.
Imagine having a coil pack in your Disco go south in the middle of the Jungle/desert/ice storm wasteland, even if you have spares on hand you're screwed.
Now imagine having a problem with a distributor in a Wrangler. Not only is it easy to get to and repair, but the part is cheap and easy to find.
If you add in location, in my case America, I can get Jeep parts in just about every Jerkwater USA boondock town on the map. Good luck finding Rover parts in BFE.
Just my 2 cents and I'm stickin' to it. :)
ps: I do love my Rover