99 DISCO2 FUEL PROB

Land Rover Forums Land Rover Classifieds Photo Gallery Member List Calendars Search Contact Us Sponsors
Land Rover Lineup News Forum FAQ Land Rover Recalls TSBs Timeslips Register Login

99 DISCO2 FUEL PROB

Printable Version

Land Rover Forums >> Vehicle Line Up >> Discovery >> 99 DISCO2 FUEL PROB

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

99 DISCO2 FUEL PROB - 12/6/2004 11:54:21 AM

kartoudi

Posts: 1
Joined: 12/6/2004
Status: offline

Hey there,
Does anyone know what is the best solution to this problem I have. My friend and I ran a test on my vehicle. The code came up with this:

"Running to rich on bank #2" The code number was 1175.

Someone told me that it means that Bank 2, which is one side of the engine block, is burning too much fuel, which could mean there is not enough air? Can anyone explain and give me the right avenue of what I should do?

Thanks,

George

Post #: 1

RE: 99 DISCO2 FUEL PROB - 12/6/2004 2:31:35 PM

Lighting90

Posts: 443
Joined: 7/14/2004
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline

Will have to find out about these dratted codes, as I can see one day I will own a Landie with a black box fitted..

_____________________________

Land Rover Series One 1952
Land Rover Defender 200TDi 1991

www.****

(in reply to kartoudi)

Post #: 2

RE: 99 DISCO2 FUEL PROB - 12/11/2004 2:47:59 AM

jury22

Posts: 15
Joined: 11/13/2004
Status: offline

Hi George I assume you are running a V8, if the fuelling is too rich on one bank suggest that the lambda sensor which is in the exhaust just down stream from the engine manifold may not be working properly. If you look at the following site it tells you how to test these components basically you need to see the voltage changing, once the engine is hot. The other way would be to swop the sensors on the 2 banks and see if the code changes to the Bank 1

http://www.ntksensors.co.uk/

Since code is so specific then must be this or a faulty injector perhaps
Good Luck and let us know how you get on

< Message edited by jury22 -- 12/11/2004 2:49:39 AM >

(in reply to Lighting90)

Post #: 3