2000 Disco II vs. 1999 CLK320?

Land Rover Forums Land Rover Classifieds Photo Gallery Member List Calendars Search Contact Us Sponsors
Land Rover Lineup News Forum FAQ Land Rover Recalls TSBs Timeslips Register Login

2000 Disco II vs. 1999 CLK320?

Printable Version

Land Rover Forum >> General Land Rover Forums >> Off Topic >> 2000 Disco II vs. 1999 CLK320?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

2000 Disco II vs. 1999 CLK320? - 11/4/2007 3:38:58 PM

dpc1192

Posts: 13
Joined: 10/28/2007
Status: offline

Which would you get?

I like the idea of an SUV because I surf and think that the extra room would be nice, but I think that the CLK is a much nicer car overall.

What do you think!

Could I fit a surfboard in the CLK?

Thanks Alot!

vs.

Post #: 1

RE: 2000 Disco II vs. 1999 CLK320? - 11/7/2007 3:07:03 AM

bigbadbannana

Posts: 4
Joined: 11/5/2007
Status: offline

To hell with it get 'em both. I got a '99 CLK 430 and i just bought a 2000 RR HSE. if you like both and cant decide, just get em both. The benz is great around town and i love the HSE because it has the all wheel drive and a hell of a lot of room to haul stuff.

(in reply to dpc1192)

Post #: 2

RE: 2000 Disco II vs. 1999 CLK320? - 11/7/2007 6:28:15 AM

Landzu

Posts: 2080
Joined: 4/7/2005
From: Dallas TX
Status: offline

Looks like a Dr. J and Mr H.
How I know, yes both or the one that fits now
and the other later.

_____________________________

I do not need the National Geographic channel
I just look out the windows of my Land Rover
Discovery code name Romulus
Prefix-N or 1996
Classic Discovery,
RPi remapped ECU
NRP Preformance cats/Y-pipe

(in reply to bigbadbannana)

Post #: 3