Land Rover Forum
Land Rover Forums   Land Rover Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Member List   Calendars   Search   Contact Us   Sponsors
Land Rover Lineup   News   Forum FAQ   Land Rover Recalls   TSBs   Timeslips   Register   Login  
 

Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion

  Printable Version
Land Rover Forum >> Vehicle Line Up >> Discovery >> Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 2:25:43 AM   
rockanomicon

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/1/2008
Status: offline
I am in the market for a new SUV, finally getting rid of the Explorer.

I have settled on the Land Rover brand, right now it seems to be the only manufacture producing SUV's with any testicular fortitude.

The question is: Which one?  In your opinion, Range Rover vs. the Discovery II?

This will the owners primary vehicle. That includes a daily 30 mile commute + weekend adventures on forest service roads, and eventually a trip through the Canadian backcountry.  I am not really in need of a luxury vehicle, what I need is a tank. Something that will endure, not a throw away automobile. ....and most importantly something I can count on starting up and not breaking down when I am five or six hundred miles from the nearest repair shop. 
Post #: 1
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 4:19:40 AM   
Different Drummer


Posts: 176
Joined: 5/28/2006
Status: offline
I drive almost 20,000 miles a year on average, and my Disco is my daily driver.  It has been truly reliable and I love its looks and versatility.  I've never owned a Range Rover so I'm not able to say much about them, but that being said, I like the looks of any Disco better than the older Range Rovers.  The newer Range Rovers, however, look pretty good IMHO.  In summary, you could find a lot cheaper vehicle to maintain, but then you get what you pay for.  I will probably get another Discovery when I finally wear mine out, but it's still going strong at 106,000 miles.  I think you'd like whichever one you go with, but be willing to spend the time and money on proper maintainence.

_____________________________

DIFFERENT DRUMMER
2003 Land Rover Discovery SE7 (Dark Gray... OK, BONITA Gray... Dang, y''all are picky!)
2003 Volkswagen New Beetle Convertible (Orange)
2008 Royal Enfield Bullet Electra Motorcycle (Red)
2002 Buell Blast Motorcycle (Yellow)

(in reply to rockanomicon)
Post #: 2
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 7:56:26 AM   
jdelp

 

Posts: 267
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
From what you're describing, get a DII.  The range rover can't do anything a DII can do off road, and you're paying more money for bells and whistles...which are more costly to repair.  Probably somewhat biased since I love my Disco...but it's true.


_____________________________

'04 Disco II SE
Colors: Silver, tan interior
miles: 60K and counting

(in reply to Different Drummer)
Post #: 3
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 11:21:24 AM   
rockanomicon

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/1/2008
Status: offline
I've been told that upon purchasing the vehicle, expect to spend at least $1000 bringing it up to par. 


Couple  more questions:

1.  How much does the annual service normally run?   (just the recommended stuff, not talking about random stuff that breaks)
2.  Oil Changes, stuff like.....is it simple enough for one to do it themselves?  (I am not very handy under the hood, but I used to change the the oil & filter etc...on my old 94' Toyota 4x4)
3.  Older or Newer? For instance there is a 2000 Disco II with 64,059 miles on it, the Land Rover dealer is asking $13900 for it. 
4.  Any years that are better or worse than others?

(in reply to jdelp)
Post #: 4
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 11:34:24 AM   
jkid


Posts: 597
Joined: 9/26/2007
Status: offline
About a $1000 is a good estimate I guess, but it depends on the condition of the vehicle and what you do yourself.

Annual service should be the same as any other vehicle.

You need to be a little more careful changing the oil on these. I drain the oil first and then refill with fresh, but don't let it drain for too long, just until it stops running steadilly. Then I replace the filter, making sure to fill the new one with fresh oil first and give it time to soak into the filter so it gets good and full.

That's way too much for a 2000.

2003 has oil pump issues.

_____________________________

01 D2 SE (90K miles) Stock For now
1982 Mercedes 300SD (270k miles)

(in reply to rockanomicon)
Post #: 5
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 12:58:01 PM   
WolfPack


Posts: 498
Joined: 1/3/2008
Status: offline
Range Rovers are pretty good all around, but definitely not as capable as the Discos offroad.  Ranges are more civilized on road than any Disco I've ever been in.  That's not to say you'd be better off taking a Geo than the Range to the trail, but I've never worried about getting stuck or breaking down the few times I've trekked out with the Range.  As for the electrics and other luxury stuff in the Ranges, I have yet to have any issue with them.  Remember everything in the Range Rover is designed to take the punishment of offroading, so the electrics are pretty tough.

The only real draw back to Land Rovers are the dealer costs.  If you can get some-most of the work done on your own, with the help of this forum of course, they're just like any other truck out there

And definitely stay away from the 2003 Discos if possible.  Not that every one is bad, but the fact that some might be, is enough for me to not buy it.  I wouldn't trade my Range Rover for a Disco for any amount of money, but then again, I've got my Blazer for offroading!


_____________________________



2001 Range Rover 4.6 SE - Coil Sprung
2000 Chevy Blazer 4x4 4.3L V6 - The Beast

(in reply to jkid)
Post #: 6
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 1:52:19 PM   
rockanomicon

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/1/2008
Status: offline
What should I be expecting as far as vehicle life expectancy?

My exploder is a '93, with 186663 miles on it.  Never a break down, never left stranded, none of the typical stuff you hear about exploders. Thats with thousands and thousands of harsh forest service road and logging roads, and temps ranging from 20F to 105F. 
Needless to say, if a grocery getter can take as much punishment as I have dished out, I have high expectations when it comes to a SUV that is actually designed to endure some punishment.

(in reply to rockanomicon)
Post #: 7
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 1:53:43 PM   
Different Drummer


Posts: 176
Joined: 5/28/2006
Status: offline
I know this sounds odd, but I wouldn't hesitate to buy a high mileage 03, but would stay away from one with low miles.  The oil pump problem generally shows itself by around 50,000 miles if it's going to happen.  That's according to the LR dealership where I live.

_____________________________

DIFFERENT DRUMMER
2003 Land Rover Discovery SE7 (Dark Gray... OK, BONITA Gray... Dang, y''all are picky!)
2003 Volkswagen New Beetle Convertible (Orange)
2008 Royal Enfield Bullet Electra Motorcycle (Red)
2002 Buell Blast Motorcycle (Yellow)

(in reply to WolfPack)
Post #: 8
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 2:09:20 PM   
rockanomicon

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/1/2008
Status: offline
 I am thinking around 99,00,01,02. Anything to watch out for in that era? 

(in reply to Different Drummer)
Post #: 9
RE: Range Rover vs Discovery ...in your opinion - 2/29/2008 2:31:56 PM   
Camdisco24


Posts: 733
Joined: 3/12/2007
Status: offline
Camdisco24's photo gallery
I dont know about things to look out for in that range of years, but I do know the 2000 is a great year. 01 and 02 are good as well. The only thing about the 99' it that that the first year of a DII so some things needed to be changed, and that shows up in the later models. But usually all the bad stuff has happened if you find a higher mileage (75,000-80,000 +). As for it taking what you dish out, i think you will be amazed. The stuff that breaks, in my opinion, is from the beating that happens on road. I would trust a disco over any truck off road if i was given a choice, i love how solid it feels compared to a jeep GC or wrangler. A disco is the most solid, yet most flexible truck you can buy. I cant say I have driven a Range Rover off road, but on road it great and very comfortable. But if you plan on ever going off road buy a disco.

Good luck!


_____________________________

Cameron
2000 Disco II "Ruby" with 103k miles

"The Devil came down to Georgia, and Mr. Daniels showed him out"

(in reply to rockanomicon)
Post #: 10
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
 
Land Rover Forum >> Vehicle Line Up >> Discovery
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
disco mike10487
spike5555026
okdiscoguy2485
landzu2080
05landrover1072
mikemeyer0945
darover896
disco2guy817
camdisco24733
ajh714

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Honda CBR Motorcycle

Land Rover Forums .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.